Skip to Content
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsroom
  • Museum
  • Careers
  • Banking
  • Research
  • Markets
  • Publications
    • Periodicals
    • Data Releases
    • Speeches
  • Events
  • Education
  • People
  • Region
The Effect of Disability Insurance Receipt on Labor Supply: A Dynamic Analysis
  • Share
  • Print
    • Text Size
    • Smaller
    • Larger
cover
No. 2012-12

This paper estimates the effect of Disability Insurance receipt on labor supply, accounting for the dynamic nature of the application process. Exploiting the effectively random assignment of judges to disability insurance cases, we use instrumental variables to address the fact that those allowed benefits are a selected sample.

  • Download Entire Publication
Last Updated: 12/06/2012

The Effect of Disability Insurance Receipt on Labor Supply: A Dynamic Analysis

Eric French, Jae Song

This paper estimates the effect of Disability Insurance receipt on labor supply, accounting for the dynamic nature of the application process. Exploiting the effectively random assignment of judges to disability insurance cases, we use instrumental variables to address the fact that those allowed benefits are a selected sample. We find that benefit receipt reduces labor force participation by 26 percentage points three years after a disability determination decision when not considering the dynamic nature of the applications process. OLS estimates are similar to instrumental variables estimates. We also find that over 60% of those denied benefits by an Administrative Law Judge are subsequently allowed benefits within 10 years, showing that most applicants apply, re-apply, and appeal until they get benefits. Next, we estimate a dynamic programming model of optimal labor supply and appeals choices. Consistent with the law, we assume that people cannot work and appeal at the same time. We match labor supply, appeals, and subsequent allowance decisions predicted by the model to the decisions observed in the data. We use the model to predict labor supply responses to benefit denial when there is no option to appeal. We find that if there was no appeals option, those denied benefits are 35 percentage points more likely to work. However, there is considerable heterogeneity in responses. Most individuals in their 40s would return to work if denied benefits, for example. Our results suggest that many of those denied benefits not because they are unable to work, but because they remain out of the labor force in order to appeal their benefit denial.

Subscribe Now

Register to receive email alerts when new issues are published.

Subscribe
More by this Author

Eric French

  • Is There Still an Investment Overhang, and if So, Should We Worry about It? (Special Issue)
  • You can’t take it with you: Asset run-down at the end of the life cycle

Jae Song

  • The Effect of Disability Insurance Receipt on Labor Supply (REVISED July 2011)
Related Topics
  • How Much Has House Lock Affected Labor Mobility and the Unemployment Rate?
  • Trends in Consumer Sentiment and Spending
  • Understanding and addressing the challenges of job loss for low-wage workers
  • Sectoral wage growth and inflation
View All

Follow Us:

FaceBook RSS Twitter YouTube
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsroom
  • Subscribe
  • Tours
  • Careers
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604-1413, USA. Tel. (312) 322-5322
Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved. Please review our
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notices