• Print
  • Email

AgLetter, No. 2007, February 2025
AgLetter: February 2025

Read our AgLetter Insights Q&A with author David Oppedahl for further insights into Seventh District farmland values and agricultural credit conditions described in this issue of AgLetter.

Summary

An annual decrease of 1 percent in the Seventh Federal Reserve District’s agricultural land values in 2024 ended a four-year run of substantial annual gains. Even so, values for “good” farmland in the District moved up 1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2024 from the third quarter, according to the respondents from 133 agricultural banks who completed the January 1 survey. Only 4 percent of the survey respondents expected farmland values to rise during the January through March period of 2025, while 26 percent expected them to fall (the majority expected them to be stable).

District agricultural credit conditions continued to exhibit signs of deterioration during the fourth quarter of 2024. In the final quarter of 2024, repayment rates for non-real-estate farm loans were sharply lower than a year ago, plus loan renewals and extensions were noticeably higher than a year earlier. Nearly 2 percent of agricultural borrowers were not likely to qualify for operating credit at the survey respondents’ banks in 2025 after qualifying in the previous year. Non-real-estate farm loan demand relative to a year ago was up for the fifth quarter in a row. For the seventh time in a row, there were fewer funds available for lending than in the same quarter of the prior year at survey respondents’ banks. The average loan-to-deposit ratio for the District moved up to 76.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2024. At the end of 2024, the District’s average nominal interest rates on farm operating and feeder cattle loans were somewhat lower than at the end of the third quarter of last year, while its average nominal interest rate on farm real estate loans was unchanged. Average real interest rates for all three kinds of loans tracked by the survey were at their lowest levels since the third quarter of 2023.

Farmland values

In 2024, the District saw an annual decrease of 1 percent in its agricultural land values (see table and map below). For the first time in five and six years, Illinois and Indiana, respectively, had annual decreases in their farmland values. In addition, Iowa had a slightly larger single-digit annual decrease in its farmland values than in 2023. In contrast, Wisconsin had a single-digit annual increase in agricultural land values for 2024. A Wisconsin banker noted there was “still very little land available for sale.” District farmland values increased 1 percent from the third quarter of 2024 to the fourth quarter.

Percent change in dollar value of “good” farmland

October 1, 2024
to
January 1, 2025
January 1, 2024
to
January 1, 2025
Illinois +1 –3
Indiana +1 –3
Iowa +1 –2
Michigan * *
Wisconsin +1 +8
Seventh District +1 –1

The map shows quarterly and year-over-year percent changes in farmland values for geographical areas within the Seventh Federal Reserve District. There were insufficient amounts of survey responses from certain geographical areas, so changes in farmland values are unavailable for these areas.

Top: October 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025

Bottom: January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025

*Insufficient response.

Adjusted for inflation by the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCEPI), District farmland values had an annual decrease of 3.4 percent in 2024, the first real decrease in five years and the largest real decrease since 2014 (see chart 1). District farmland values edged down from their 2023 peak, but were still 11 percent above their 2013 peak in real terms and up 43 percent from their 2013 peak in nominal terms (see chart 2).

1. Annual real change in Seventh District farmland values

Chart 1 is a bar chart that plots the annual real percent change in Seventh District farmland values from 1974 through 2024. From 2014 through 2019, the yearly changes in District farmland values were somewhat negative, while from 2020 through 2023, they were positive, with a major spike in 2021. The positive trend ended last year: District farmland values had an annual real decrease of 3.4 percent in 2024.
Sources: Authors’ calculations based on data from Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago surveys of farmland values; and U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCEPI), from Haver Analytics.

2. Indexes of Seventh District farmland values

Chart 2 is a line chart that plots the index of Seventh District farmland values in nominal terms and the index of Seventh District farmland values adjusted by the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index from 1974 through 2024. Both indexes decreased slightly in 2024 after moving up in the previous four years.
Sources: Authors’ calculations based on data from Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago surveys of farmland values; and U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCEPI), from Haver Analytics.

Strong crop yields were a boon for a majority of District farms in 2024, despite drought in much of the District for at least part of the growing season. Based on calculations using U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) data, the District states’ corn yields increased 3.7 percent in 2024 from 2023 and their soybean yields increased 1.1 percent. Harvested corn acres were down 3.2 percent in 2024 from 2023, while harvested soybean acres were up 3.5 percent. On net, corn production by District states increased 0.3 percent, reaching 6.80 million bushels (the second most ever, after 2016’s record). In addition, soybean production by District states rose 4.6 percent, to 1.84 million bushels (the second largest ever, behind 2021’s record). National corn stocks decreased 1 percent from 2023, while soybean stocks increased 3 percent (see final table). Although corn stocks declined, the USDA projected prices for the 2024–25 crop year of $4.25 per bushel for corn (down 6.6 percent from the previous crop year). Given the broader availability of soybeans, their prices were projected to be $10.20 per bushel (down 18 percent). Using these prices, estimated revenues for the District states’ 2024 harvest would be down 6.3 percent for corn and 14 percent for soybeans from their 2023 levels.

In contrast, prices for livestock products were much higher at the end of 2024 than at the start of the year. In December 2024, the index of prices for livestock and associated products was up 33 percent from 2023; the prices for cattle, hogs, and milk were up 10 percent, 18 percent, and 14 percent from a year earlier, respectively (see final table). Moreover, given ongoing impacts from avian influenza, egg prices were up 132 percent from the year prior, though these prices were down 4 percent from two years ago. According to the USDA’s February assessment for 2024, net farm income for the nation was projected to decline by 5.6 percent ($8.2 billion) from 2023 despite lower input costs, mostly because of inventory adjustments and lower government payments. The dip in farm cash receipts from 2023 was minor given that the drop in cash receipts for crops was almost entirely offset by an increase in cash receipts for animals and their products. Nationally, 2024 real net farm income, though down from 2023, remained above its 2020 level. The District’s heavier reliance on corn and soybean revenues created tighter profit margins for lots of farms in the region.

Credit conditions

A deterioration in agricultural credit conditions was evident in the fourth quarter of 2024 as several respondents reported declines in working capital for farm operations. An Illinois respondent noted: “Working capital levels have declined significantly the last two years. In addition, projected 2025 cash flows are very tight.” During the fourth quarter of 2024, demand for non-real-estate farm loans was higher than a year ago: With 44 percent of survey respondents reporting an increase in the demand for non-real-estate farm loans from a year earlier and 15 percent reporting a decrease, the index of loan demand was 129 in the fourth quarter of 2024. The index of funds availability was 90 in the fourth quarter of 2024, indicating a continuing decline in the level of funds available for lending from a year ago; funds availability was lower than a year earlier at 19 percent of the survey respondents’ banks and higher at just 9 percent. At 76.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2024, the District’s average loan-to-deposit ratio was slightly higher than that of the previous quarter (and over 4 percentage points lower than the level desired by responding bankers).

The share of the District’s farm loan portfolio assessed as having “major” or “severe” repayment problems was 4.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2024—the highest it’s been since the end of 2020. Non-real-estate loan repayment rates relative to a year ago were down for the fifth consecutive quarter. The index of non-real-estate farm loan repayments was 64, with 36 percent of survey respondents reporting lower rates for the fourth quarter of 2024 than a year earlier and zero respondents reporting higher rates. Non-real-estate farm loan renewals and extensions in the final quarter of 2024 were higher than in the final quarter of 2023, as 31 percent of survey respondents reported more of them and 1 percent reported fewer.

Up from the previous year’s reading, 40 percent of survey respondents’ banks tightened their credit standards for farm loans in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared with a year earlier, while 60 percent of the respondents’ banks kept their credit standards essentially unchanged. However, 81 percent of responding bankers noted their banks did not raise the amounts of collateral required for customers to qualify for non-real-estate farm loans during the final quarter of 2024 relative to a year ago, while 19 percent noted their banks required larger amounts.

Agricultural interest rates in nominal terms (except for farm real estate loans) fell slightly from the third quarter of 2024 to the fourth quarter. As of January 1, 2025, the District’s average nominal interest rates for new loans were 7.78 percent on operating loans, 7.88 percent on feeder cattle loans, and 7.19 percent on farm real estate loans; in real terms (after being adjusted for inflation with the PCEPI), the average interest rates for all three types of agricultural loans were at their lowest levels since the third quarter of 2023.

Credit conditions at Seventh District agricultural banks

a At end of period.
b Bankers responded to each item by indicating whether conditions in the current quarter were higher or lower than (or the same as) in the year-earlier quarter. The index numbers are computed by subtracting the percentage of bankers who responded “lower” from the percentage who responded “higher” and adding 100.
Note: Historical data on Seventh District agricultural credit conditions are available online.
Interest rates on farm loans
Loan demand Funds availability Loan repayment rates Average loan-to-deposit ratio Operating
loansa
Feeder
cattlea
Real estatea
(index)b (index)b (index)b (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent)
2023
Jan–Mar 78 102 123 70.3 7.97 7.93 7.14
Apr–June 77 83 105 72.8 8.24 8.19 7.33
July–Sept 81 72 100 74.3 8.50 8.47 7.70
Oct–Dec 106 69 92 74.0 8.51 8.49 7.60
2024
Jan–Mar 136 78 78 76.1 8.44 8.45 7.57
Apr–June 104 74 85 76.9 8.47 8.44 7.55
July–Sept 120 92 76 75.7 8.12 8.09 7.19
Oct–Dec 129 90 64 76.7 7.78 7.88 7.19

Looking forward

According to survey respondents at the beginning of 2025, 1.7 percent of their farm customers with operating credit in the year just past were not likely to qualify for new operating credit in the year ahead (somewhat above the survey’s level at the start of 2024). Farm real estate loan volumes were forecasted to be smaller in the first three months of 2025 compared with the same three months of 2024. Nevertheless, non-real-estate loan volumes (specifically for operating loans, feeder cattle loans, and loans guaranteed through the USDA’s Farm Service Agency) were forecasted to be larger in the first three months of 2025 compared with the same three months of a year earlier. Over this time frame, lending for farm machinery and grain storage construction was expected to decline relative to a year ago. Plus, survey respondents at the start of 2025 predicted capital expenditures by farmers would once again be lower in the year ahead than in the year just ended for land purchases or improvements, buildings and facilities, machinery and equipment, and trucks and autos.

There were fewer responding bankers (4 percent) who projected agricultural land values to go up in the next quarter (in this case, the first quarter of 2025) than those who predicted them to go down (26 percent). With that said, there seemed to be some transactions for farmland in places at much higher prices than for similar ground elsewhere; an Illinois respondent attributed this phenomenon to “strong competition among neighbors buying with cash on hand.” Thus, there will likely be marked variability in sales prices for specific parcels. But again, on average, District farmland values were expected to be relatively flat or moving slightly downward in the first quarter of 2025, as they had been prior to the pandemic.

Selected agricultural economic indicators

N.A. Not applicable.
Sources: Authors' calculations based on data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Association of Equipment Manufacturers.
Percent change from
Latest period Value Prior period Year ago Two years ago
Prices received by farmers (index, 2011=100) December 127 5.3 12 –8
Crops (index, 2011=100) December 93 –1.8 –9 –28
Corn ($ per bu.) December 4.23 3.9 –12 –36
Hay ($ per ton) December 157.00 –1.3 –19 –33
Soybeans ($ per bu.) December 9.79 –0.5 –25 –32
Wheat ($ per bu.) December 5.49 0.7 –19 –39
Livestock and products (index, 2011=100) December 172 8.3 33 14
Barrows & gilts ($ per cwt.) December 62.90 –3.7 18 0
Steers & heifers ($ per cwt.) December 193.00 1.6 10 22
Milk ($ per cwt.) December 23.30 –3.7 14 –5
Eggs ($ per doz.) December 4.33 37.9 132 –4
Consumer prices (index, 1982–84=100) December 316 0.0 3 6
Food December 334 0.2 3 5
Production or stocks
Corn stocks (mil. bu.) December 1 12,074 N.A. –1 12
Soybean stocks (mil. bu.) December 1 3,100 N.A. 3 3
Wheat stocks (mil. bu.) December 1 1,570 N.A. 10 20
Beef production (bil. lb.) December 2.20 –0.7 0 –1
Pork production (bil. lb.) December 2.33 –0.2 –1 4
Milk production (bil. lb.) December 18.7 4.2 0 –1
Agricultural exports ($ mil.) December 16,150 –7.1 4 –5
Corn (mil. bu.) December 214 15.8 13 47
Soybeans (mil. bu.) December 293 –19.4 65 –4
Wheat (mil. bu.) December 61 16.7 10 53
Farm machinery (units)
Tractors, 40 HP or more December 7,727 95 –15 –20
40 to 100 HP December 5,276 75 –9 –17
100 HP or more December 2,451 157 –27 –25
Combines December 444 206 –26 –39

Opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago or the Federal Reserve System.

Featured Authors
David Oppedahl
David Oppedahl
Policy Advisor
Elizabeth Kepner
Elizabeth Kepner
Senior Research Analyst
Having trouble accessing something on this page? Please send us an email and we will get back to you as quickly as we can.

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604-1413, USA. Tel. (312) 322-5322

Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved.

Please review our Privacy Policy | Legal Notices